Working Girl had power suits and female ambition. But wheres the modern equivalent?

The 80s movie celebrated women striving to get ahead. Now 30 years on, Hollywood seems to want to put women in their place


The women in Working Girl looked amazing in their power suits. How do professional female characters dress now? Cyrus, by email

I like the cut of your jib, Cyrus! Any man who spends his evenings not just watching but RE-watching Working Girl is welcome to sit by me. And you are right, women dont wear power suits in movies any more, but that is because women in real life dont wear power suits these days. In fact, one of the most interesting fashion stories told in Working Girl, aside from that it really is possible to pay $6,000 for an item of clothing and its not even leather, is that you can see the power suit changing shape in this late-80s movie, shifting to something decidedly more 90s. Whereas Tess (Melanie Griffith) and Cynthia (Joan Cusack) wear big shoulders and heavy jackets, Katherine (Sigourney Weaver), the woman with the real power, wears far more minimalist, slimmed-down suits. As Tess gains power, she does, too. In the last scene, Tess turns up to her new job, which she thinks is a secretarial position, in a heavily shoulder-padded jacket. But when she realises she is actually the boss, the jacket starts to slip off her shoulders. Its 1988, baby, and a new era is beginning: no longer do big shoulders symbolise female power.

Recommended For You

VydioX IMX

VydioX IMX is a premium membership that gets you always up-to-date training and software on a weekly basis

(Whether then having Harrison Ford then pack Griffiths ickle wickle lunch box for her, as if she were his toddler daughter instead of his extremely impressive girlfriend, symbolises female power is a question we shall have to save for another day.)

But your question touches, I think, on something that goes beyond suits, Cyrus. The question isnt what do ambitious women wear in the movies these days, its why arent they celebrated in movies the way they used to be?

Fortunately, a film comes out tomorrow that illustrates the point. Now, you might have thought that if I had written a 2,500-word article on A Star Is Born last week for this paper I might have got that film out of my system. Well, you, my friend, have underestimated just how much I overthink popular culture. Now whos looking like the foolish one?

While the new A Star Is Born sticks very closely to the 1954 and 1976 versions of this movie, it differs in one huge and telling way: whereas in the earlier films the female character becomes more successful than the man because she is more talented, in the new version it is just because she becomes a creative sell-out. Instead of making Ally (Lady Gaga) a better singer-songwriter than Jack (Bradley Cooper), the movie has her jettison her songwriting skill in order to become a pop star who sings garbage pop songs, dyes her hair silly colours and puts up with cheesy people around her. Thus, Jack remains An Artist while Ally is just a plastic product.

It is a fascinating twist, partly because Cooper directed the movie and this is a definite change to the franchise that flatters his character. It is also interesting to do this to the movie now, in an era when female pop stars are such a dominant force: Beyonc, Taylor, Rihanna, Ariana and oh yeah! Lady Gaga. The whole thing feels like a reassuring pat on the shoulder to all the male artists left in their dust, and its very weird to see Gaga play a character who feels too close for comfort. But this also feels like the natural conclusion to the direction Hollywood movies have been going in for the past few decades. Once female ambition was normal sexy, even. Most obviously, in 1940s His Girl Friday, Hildys (Rosalind Russell) professionalism is what Walter (Cary Grant) loves about her and, even when they marry at the end, its obvious they are going to work on their honeymoon, and he is delighted by it. In Working Girl, female ambition is sexy, in the form of Griffith as long as she doesnt become more successful than the man,a problem embodied by Weaver.

Which brings us to the 21st century and all you need to do to see how bad things have got is to compare Kay Thompsons character in 1957s Funny Face with Meryl Streeps in 2006s The Devil Wears Prada: they are both fashion magazine editors, but Streeps professionalism is mocked whereas Thompsons is admired. (And, of course, in true 21st-century romcom style, the conclusion of the latter film is that the young female character should give up her excellent job and try to get her boyfriend back. Yay women!)

Recommended For You


SOCIAL BARS add-on for Conversion Gorilla. Turn your bars into high traffic grabbing social wonders!

LetMailbox Pro Advanced

LetMailbox - Your All-In-One TOOLBOX for RAPID Returns on ANY EMAIL Broadcasts!!

The question isnt what ambitious women should wear in movies but when will ambitious women learn their lesson and give up their jobs for their men? Ally doesnt in the latest A Star Is Born and, well, we all know how that turns out. A salutary tale to learn from, ladies.

Original Article : HERE ; This post was curated & posted using : RealSpecific

Thank you for taking the time to read our article.

If you enjoyed our content, we'd really appreciate some "love" with a share or two.

And ... Don't forget to have fun!

Recommended Products

Million Dollar Sales Videos - Video Turbo Store - Upgrade 4

The once in a lifetime opportunity to swipe the proven video sales tactics of 3 sales videos that have generated millions in sales.

Leave a Reply